Milgram's Expirement


A social psychologist Stanley Milgram examined several justifications offered by Nazis during the Nuremberg Trial including Adolf Eichmann’s trial in Jerusalem. After watching trial after trial, Milgram noticed that all of their defenses were strikingly similar. Most claimed that they were simply “following orders”. Milgram asked himself “Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?”

Milgram recruited ordinary people who were told that the experiment they were going to take part in was to test the effects of punishment on learning ability. They could play the role of either “teachers” or “learners” in this experiment. The participants thought they had an equal chance to become a learner or a teacher but the experiment was designed so that all participants were going to become teachers. The learner was actually an actor working for Milgram himself. Teachers of the experiment were led to a room with a “scientist” who would monitor and evaluate the experiment. The learner was sent to another room where there were speakers so the teacher could hear his answer. The learner would have wires attached to him that transmitted electricity each time he got a question wrong  Silence was treated as a wrong answer. Each time the learner got a question wrong, the amount of electricity transmitted to the learner would gradually increase. The first shock of electricity was 15 volts of electricity and the highest was a lethal 450 volts of electricity. 

The learner gave the wrong answer on purpose multiple times to see how far the teacher would go into the experiment. The experiment might seem risky, but there was a catch: the learner isn’t getting shocked by electricity. The point of the experiment was to see how many people would reach 450 volts of electricity. All of the participants weren’t willing to severely harm or kill another human being. However, the “scientist” in the room prodded the people to continue. Eventually, the scientist told the teachers they had no other choice but to continue. Some did refuse to continue. Milgram thought this would be the norm but he was wrong. The majority of the people (65%) reached all the way to 450 volts of electricity. Those who refused still reached 300 volts.

To figure out how many people were willing to go against their conscious to obey the scientist in this experiment, Milgram set up a slightly different experiment. This experiment would involve the teacher putting their hand on a shock plate so they could deliver the punishment. Both the learner and teacher would only get shocked once to ensure that the life of the learner isn’t in danger. After the teacher was shocked once the learner would be put in a separate room where the teacher couldn’t see them. This time, most of the teachers refused to go to 450 volts.

Most of those who went to 450 volts regretted their decision and blamed themselves quite harshly which is why Milgram’s Experiment isn’t practiced today. Some of the teachers who obeyed the scientist justified their actions by putting all the blame on their leader (the scientist). This is similar to what Adolf Eichmann and other Nazis did to justify their actions. The rebellious subjects argued it was more ethical to protect the needs of the learner than the needs of the experimenter.

Milgram’s Experiment answered his question. The experiment showed that most people submit to their authorities even when they demand them to do something against their will. There are two reasons for this. The first is authority figure seemed fit for the job. He was an educated scientist who made people feel wrong for questioning him. Another reason is they believed in the cause. They believed, in this case, they were doing the experiment for science. When we look back on history, we see many powerful leaders trying to manipulate the psychology of humans to their advantage. When an unfortunate event happens, it’s easy for extremists, like Adolf Hitler to take power by exploiting people’s fears and promoting ideas that people believe in. Once in power, they have become the “authority figure” and they will use their authority to make people afraid to question them. Eventually, they will have many people's support or submission. 






Sources:

  1. CommonLit | the Milgram Experiment - University of North Carolina at ... https://www.uncp.edu/sites/default/files/2019-01/Milgrim%20Experiment%20Common%20Lit.pdf. 

  2. Milgram's Experiment on Obedience to Authority, https://nature.berkeley.edu/ucce50/ag-labor/7article/article35.htm. 


Comments

  1. This is such a different blog idea that I have not seen much of this year which drew me into reading this even more. The way you described this really made want to keep reading and interested me to read more psychological experiments. Good writing!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Milgram's Experiment is probably one of the most interesting psychological experiments I've ever heard. I really appreciate the combination of conciseness and detail that you put into this blog. The connection you made with not just the Nazi regime but also historical extremists and dictators made this blog go from good to terrific. Great job!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I haven't heard of this experiment until now and its so interesting. Your style of writing and intertwining details into your blog never made reading it a dull moment. Its definitely a topic I'm going to research more about now!

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is such an interesting experiment and your blog frames it so well. The topic of justifying bad deeds along with the ways psychology were related was very intriguing. I especially like how you link the Nazi's as an example of figures of authority manipulating the people under them to do bad deeds. Nice job!

    ReplyDelete
  5. This was a super interesting and well written blog! I always wonder how willing I am to give up my morals or the things I think are right just because I assume that someone else is smarter than me or is "in the right", and it's interesting to see that be tested in a controlled environment. This experiment tests a really interesting part of the human psyche and your connection to the nazis made this blog really good! Great job!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Really interesting blog! I've learned about this experiment before but I didn't actually know the history and reason behind it. This connection of psychology to history and politics is really intriguing.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This seems like a fascinating experiment. I've never really thought about the lengths to which people go when they believe they are under the leadership of powerful person. I am shocked that such a large amount of people ended up following through with the experiment all the way until the lethal dosage of electricity. The blog was written very well, as it felt both informational and like a story as I read. Great job!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I have heard of this experiment before but didn't fully understand it until reading your blog. You did a really good job writing how the experiment works and how it connects to psychology

    ReplyDelete
  9. I had briefly learned about this experiment once, and you explained it really well! The thing that stuck with me the most about you blog was the defenses of the participants. It makes me sad that some people tried to justify what they did by putting all the blame on someone else instead of owning up to their actions. Great blog!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment